Sovereignty, Substance, and Public Support for European Courts’ Human Rights Rulings
نویسندگان
چکیده
Is the public backlash against human rights rulings from European courts driven by substantive concerns over case outcomes, procedural sovereignty, or combinations thereof? We conducted preregistered survey experiments in Denmark, France, Poland, Spain, and United Kingdom using three vignettes: a foreigner who faces extradition, person fighting fine for burning Qurans, home owner contesting eviction. Each vignette varies with respect to whether court disagrees national (deference treatment) an applicant wins (outcome treatment). find little evidence that deference moves willingness implement judgments acceptance of authority but ample outcomes matter. Even nationalists authoritarians are unmoved decisions as long they agree outcome. These findings imply nationalist opposition is more about content than location domestic international may be similar forces.
منابع مشابه
Human Rights, Autonomy and National Sovereignty
This paper examines the legal and ethical problems involved in reconciling two separate rights, each of which plays a fundamental role in the current philosophical debate surrounding international relations and international law: the right to national sovereignty to which many states lay claim, on the one hand, and the right to selfdetermination, on the other. Refusal to grant the right of self...
متن کاملSovereignty transformed: a sociology of human rights.
This paper examines how global interdependencies and the consolidation of a human rights discourse are transforming national sovereignty. Social researchers frequently address the supremacy of state sovereignty and the absoluteness of human rights as mutually exclusive categories. However, rather than presupposing that a universal rights discourse is necessarily leading to the demise of soverei...
متن کاملMental health courts – a human rights perspective
This presentation analyzes specialised mental health courts (MHCs), as one solution to the long-standing, growing challenge of dealing fairly and justly with persons with mental illness (PMIs) coming before the criminal justice system, from a human rights (HR) perspective. MHCs have garnered professional and political support in North America. Redefining their primary purpose from the determina...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Political Science Review
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0003-0554', '1537-5943']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421001143